ALL.BG форуми
ALL.BG поща форуми чат стая обяви картички


Форуми » Здраве » Хомеопатия и Алтернативна медицина

Страници: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | >> (покажи всички)
Alfa Beta

***

Регистриран: 07.11.2006
Мнения: 191
От: Italy
Re: The five biological laws
    #1707369 - 12.04.2007 13:15 [Re: Отто]

Новата Германска медицина на др. Хамер и прилагането й в разли4ни страни - ето историята на известната италианска актриса ЕЛЕОНОРА БРИЛИЯДОРИ в борбата й с рака и осмислянето на теорията за 5-тте биологи4ни закона.

ЕЛЕОНОРА БРИЛИЯДОРИ - "ПОБЕДИХ РАКА, БЕЗ ДА СЕ ЛЕКУВАМ"

Журналиста: Вие имахте една много сериозна болест...

Брилиядори: Преди 10 години ми казаха, 4е до 6 месеца ще умра. Тъй като ве4е бях загубила майка си и баба си, и ги бях видяла как угасват в ужасни страдания, дължащи се на химиотерапията, се убедих, 4е болни4ният път е само един от на4ините да умреш - възможно най-лошия. Затова не предприех никакво ле4ение, дори и инвазивни изследвания. В една такава екстремна ситуация като тази, която изживявах, с4итах за абсурдно да се подложа да ме дуп4ат, режат, отварят... Не съм се подлагала дори на химиотерапия. Не само защото така се предизвиква създаването на нови физи4ески проблеми, но и защото се задействат страхови механизми. След 3 години карциномът, който имах на 4ерния дроб, из4езна - отиде си, когато вирусът на хепатита го метаболизира...

Журналиста: Вирусът на хепатита?

Брилиядори: На ниво 4ерен дроб той е симбионтът, който, когато е приклю4ил конфликта, разрешава карцинома на 4ерния дроб. Това техни4еско обяснение го разбрах по-късно, когато открих теорията на Хамер за туморите. След оздравяването ми наистина запо4нах своя път на познания по тази тема. Сред системите за самоизлекуване на индивида, които изу4авах, НОВАТА ГЕРМАНСКА МЕДИЦИНА ми се струва най-напредналото достижение. Нейният основоположник е др. Reek Geer Hamer, по-известен с историята, слу4ила се в Корсика, когато синът на Хамер беше застрелян с пушка, за което бе обвинен принц Емануеле ди Савоя.
Именно в следствие на тази тъжна история, лекарят развива рак на тестисите, а съпругата му - рак на гръдта. Оттам интуицията му го отвежда до революционизиране на самите основи на медицината - Хамер разбира, 4е канцерогенните механизми имат биологи4на зависимост.

Журналиста: Така според Вас тялото би оздравяло само' от туморите...

Брилиядори: Да, когато 4овек отива за поставяне на диагноза, туморът е ве4е в процес на самоизлекуване. Лекарите оба4е прекъсват естествения процес на ле4ение и предизвикват метастази, които не са нищо друго освен нови конфликти, дължащи се на самата интервенция.

Журналиста: Зна4и Вие не направихте нищо, за да се лекувате?

Бралиядори: Направих много неща, които оба4е имаха отношение към моите хранителни предпо4итания, поради факта, 4е си останах в къщи, докато бях зле. Всъщност, има хора, които имат тумор и си живеят много добре. Според Хамер вси4ки естествени терапии имат своето основание да съществуват, затова достатъ4но е да гладуваш или да практикуваш хомеопатия, за да разрешиш един проблем. Ако 4овек е решил да се лекува с "цветове", със "слън4еви води" или с уринотерапия, е все добре. Стига да не се възпрепятстват ествествените процеси, винаги може да се търси собствения път. Туморът тръгва винаги от мозъка, т.е. от скрито изискване и е "конструктивен", следователно не трябва да се страхуваме от него.

Журналиста: В заклю4ение, това какво озна4ава?

Брилиядори: Понятието за ле4ение, разбирано според традиционния подход, не помага, защото 4овек мисли, 4е оздравяването му зависи от "надбягване с екипировка" - т.е. от лекарствата, които му се дават. Трябва оба4е да се разбере, 4е се оздравява само с интегрирането на биологи4ните системи: вирусите и бактериите, вместо да се поразяват, трябва да се осмислят в тяхната положителна функция. 4есто, когато има вирус, организмът само се опитва да завърши един "възстановителен" процес - в слу4ая на хепатита при тумор на 4ерния дроб. Ракът не възниква от една полудяла клетка, а е знак за някаква необходимост на даден 4овек. Ракът задейства механизми, които имат биологи4на цел. Ако се оставят да завършат процеса, ще обработят конфликта.
Туморът, всъщност, се излекува сам в 90 % от слу4аите.

Журналиста: Методът на Хамер практикува ли се в Италия?

Брилиядори: Аз, откакто посетих курс за законите на Хамер (5-тте биологи4ни закона, бел. на пр.), предназна4ен за лекари, нямам ве4е сред приятелите такива, които да умират от рак, защото ги съветвам, без да се правя на доктор (защото не съм такъв) как да се отнасят.
Лекарите на Новата медицина ве4е на лекуват химиотерапизирани хора, защото все пак те рано или късно стигат до смъртта по при4ина на опустошенията, извършени от болни4ната медицина.

Журналиста: Вси4ко това законно ли е?

Брилиядори: Проблемът е вътре в болницата, където, според мен, трябва да се ходи само за диагностиката. После свободно се взема решение.
Откакто познавам връзката душа-тяло не вземам ве4е лекарства. Здравето ми е по-добро днес, отколкото когато бях на 20 год., и смятам, 4е го доказах в "Нощ върху леда", където показах класа и на младите моми4ета."

Инфо - сп."ВИВЕРСАНИ Е БЕЛЛИ", март 2007


Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Отто
Човек
***

Регистриран: 15.09.2004
Мнения: 1989
Re: The five biological laws
    #1747553 - 10.05.2007 12:48 [Re: Alfa Beta]

http://www.explorepub.com/cgi-bin/explor...;keywords=hamer

И оЩе един артикел е иzляzьл на Caroline Markolin,но не мога да го намеря в списанието.

--------------------
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" G.Orwell


Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Отто
Човек
***

Регистриран: 15.09.2004
Мнения: 1989
Re: The five biological laws
    #1749993 - 11.05.2007 19:15 [Re: Отто]

Ще си поzволя да сложа снимка от комп.томография с ясно виждаЩите се "конфликти"




Тук е увеличена.
http://www.investireoggi.it/phpBB2/immagini/1127599171tacdihamer.jpg

Дуктален мама карцином


--------------------
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" G.Orwell


Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Alfa Beta

***

Регистриран: 07.11.2006
Мнения: 191
От: Italy
Re: The five biological laws
    #1750292 - 11.05.2007 23:47 [Re: Отто]

Цитат:

http://www.explorepub.com/cgi-bin/explor...;keywords=hamer

И оЩе един артикел е иzляzьл на Caroline Markolin,но не мога да го намеря в списанието.




Това ли е статията, която търсиш?
http://germannewmedicine.ca/documents/Explore%20GNM%20Website%20Update.pdf

Caroline Markolin е референта на НМГ в Канада.
Линка е

http://germannewmedicine.ca/documents/welcome.html

Редактирано от Alfa Beta (11.05.2007 23:48)


Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Отто
Човек
***

Регистриран: 15.09.2004
Мнения: 1989
Re: The five biological laws
    #1750585 - 12.05.2007 10:45 [Re: Alfa Beta]

Да,благодаря ти.
Намерих я и в самото списание.Брой 16,а не 6.

--------------------
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" G.Orwell


Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Отто
Човек
***

Регистриран: 15.09.2004
Мнения: 1989
Re: The five biological laws
    #1760106 - 19.05.2007 11:33 [Re: Отто]

Темата е погледната 100 пьти откакто сьм сложил снимките.


--------------------
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" G.Orwell


Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Отто
Човек
***

Регистриран: 15.09.2004
Мнения: 1989
Re: The five biological laws
    #1786022 - 08.06.2007 11:18 [Re: Отто]

http://www.thescientificworld.com/SCIENT...amp;From=Result

НА Тоzи Линк има само мальк абсттракт от самата статия.Цялата може да се порьча онлайн.
Засега са поне хубави новини и вьрви напред с верификацията на теорията му.

--------------------
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" G.Orwell


Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Отто
Човек
***

Регистриран: 15.09.2004
Мнения: 1989
Re: The five biological laws
    #1791584 - 12.06.2007 10:38 [Re: Отто]

Статията е отворена временно свободно да се 4ете.
В самият форум от линка има и нови постинги на Др.Хамер.

http://cgi.thescientificworld.co.uk/cgi-bin/processHtml.pl?Id=2005.03.16.html&format=Dreamweaver

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this paper was to review, from a theoretical perspective, the Hamer system of holistic cancer medicine[1,2,3,4] that he called "the new medicine", with the purpose of guiding both the physician and the patient in the very difficult area of holistic treatment of cancer. We all want the best for our patients and we believe that the solution is a wise combination of conventional and holistic therapies, in medicine in general and also in the treatment of cancer. We were not aware of the work by Ryke Geerd Hamer until recently, when his work was discussed at the First International Conference on Holistic Healthcare in Copenhagen, November 1-2, 2004, in connection with the presentation of the first papers from our own holistic cancer healing project[5,6]. This paper is a critical review of the publications of Hamer[1,2,3,4] after reading his material and conducting an Internet and Medline search. Our aim is to examine if the medical principles found by Hamer, what he called his "medical laws", are substantiated by contemporary holistic medical theory.


RYKE GEERD HAMER

Ryke Geerd Hamer, MD was born in 1935 and grew up in Frisia, Germany. He started medical and theological studies in Tubingen and at age 20 years, passed the preliminary examination in medicine and completed his theological examinations at 22. At 24 years of age, Hamer passed his medical state examination in Marburg and after his residency 2 years later, he was granted a professional license as a doctor of medicine. Then followed a number of years at the University Clinics of Tubingen and Heidelberg and in 1972 his specialization in internal medicine[1].

Hamer is now 70 years old and his professional life finished. He has not been allowed to practice medicine since 1986. The reason for revoking his license, according to his own biography, was due to his lack of ability to cooperate with the German biomedical physicians[1]. To our knowledge, he is still in prison for practicing without a license even after being sentenced to prison in 1993 and 1997 for unlawful practice of medicine in Germany. Followers of Hamer in Austria and France have been investigated for murder after cancer patients have terminated their prescribed chemotherapy to follow the treatment scheme of Hamer.

Holistic treatment of cancer has become increasingly popular and the Hamer system of holistic cancer treatment has been one of the most popular, but also one of the most controversial. Hamer received his experience from working with more than 10,000 patients[1] and several self-help groups are building on his ideas in Germany, Austria, Italy, and Norway today. Hopelessly sick patients from all over the world study his system to find hope for themselves, while texts, audiotapes, and books by him and about him[1,2,3,4] have been widely distributed and translated into numerous languages. Hamer worked together with his wife, Sigrid, also a physician, in private practice and together they had two girls and two boys. He worked on several projects and created several inventions, like the nontraumatic Hamer-scalpel for plastic surgery (which cuts 20 times more sharply than a razor), a special bone saw for plastic surgery, a massage table that automatically adjusts to the contours of the body, and a device for transcutaneous serum diagnosis. In August 1978, his son, Dirk, was accidentally shot. Dirk's battle before death lasted for almost 4 months, while his father watched him day and night. It became clear to Hamer, 3 years later, that this sad life event had created an internal shock that he believed resulted in the development of a testicular carcinoma. He worked on understanding his own disease and, during this process, experienced a spontaneous remission. This gave him the understanding that the things he corrected within himself during this process of accelerated personal growth was actually what cured his own cancer. He later named this type of cancer-inducing conflict the "Dirk Hamer Syndrome": a biological conflict or shock that catches one unexpectedly and remains in the body for years leaving it vulnerable to development of disease[1].

In 1981, Hamer thought that these connections applied to cancer and submitted his discovery to the University in Tubingen as a postdoctoral thesis for qualification as a university lecturer. The main objective of the thesis was to provide his results to the University in order to test his hypothesis on patients. In May 1982, the University rejected the work on the interconnections between the psyche and cancer. Over the next few years, Hamer tried repeatedly to open a hospital or clinic as a refuge for his patients so that they could benefit from his knowledge. This was made impossible by court actions against him. In 1986, the District of Koblenz initiated an action to stop Hamer from practicing medicine on the basis that he "failed to deny the iron rule of cancer and failed to convert to the tenets of official medicine." The court also ordered that the University of Tubingen should continue his postdoctoral thesis proceedings. Nothing happened until January 3, 1994, when the judgment to validate Hamer's thesis was executed, but after 13 years, it was unlikely that the University would test his ideas and on the 22nd April, the University announced that "a verification within the framework of the postdoctoral thesis was not planned."

In 2003, branches of the "New Medicine" opened in Oslo and Bergen, where they (through the writings of Hamer) claim that international Jewry knows the cure for cancer and other lethal diseases, but refuses to disclose it in order to exterminate the non-Jews of the world. Hamer has drawn heavily on the racist writings of British New Age conspiracist David Icke, but in this review we will concentrate on his claims for a cure of cancer. The activities of the New Medicine were condemned by the Norwegian Research Council in March 2003.


A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE WORK OF HAMER

As it seems that Hamer found something of importance for many patients, we found it of importance to understand how his problems with the academic society and "medical establishment" came about, since it seemed as if he was successful in many cases, highly loved, and appreciated by thousands of his patients. Unfortunately, a Medline search (www.pubmed.gov) showed that we completely lack clinical trials testing his method. From a scientific point of view, Hamer's life and work are interesting and important for the development of scientific holistic medicine. Most of the problems of Hamer's work (seen from the written texts on his work only) seemingly arose from the way Hamer structured his understanding into an idiosyncratic system of holistic healing with five fundamental "medical laws", intending to address the healing of the patient as a whole person, while healing spirit, mind, and body at the same time. Some of these "medical laws" are in agreement with the theories acknowledged by modern holistic medicine such as the theory of coherence by Aaron Antonovsky (1923-1994) that explains that health comes from re-establishing coherence[7,8,9,10,11,12]. This is related to the work and ideas of Abraham Harold Maslow (1908-1970) and Viktor Emil Frankl (1905-1997) and the most progressive resilience literature, as well as our own work: the theory of the purpose of life and the life mission theory that explain that the cause of much suffering and disease results from resignation of the purpose of life[13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The simple explanation is that we repress our deep wishes and needs (our self) to adapt to our early environment and our parents; when we do so too radically, we accumulate vulnerability, which becomes an important co-factor in a later development of diseases like cancer. Other medical principles Hamer identified and called "medical laws" unfortunately lack the content and structure that is normally expected from medical science, as they do not acknowledge and incorporate the established knowledge of immunology, toxicology, and other medical fields.

While reading his book, it appears that Hamer was a truly holistic physician: "The most important of everything is that the patient… have obtained new understanding, deep trust in the physician and a real insight in what is going on"[1, p. 45]. In his work, Hamer used the well-known efficiency and healing power of first winning the trust of his patients and then letting the patient do the work of healing himself. From our perspective, built on many such meaningful statements, his widespread reputation, and popularity among patients, Hamer was a great clinical physician. From our review of his writings, it seems that he was not, however, so great on theory. The lack of an academically acceptable explanation for his work is really very sad. Had Hamer only known more of Hippocrates and the holistic medical histories of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam, he would have been much better off referring to these traditions instead of insisting on finding out everything for himself and making his own new system.

On the other hand, we need the wheel of medicine to be reinvented again and again to keep it fresh and useful for the patients of our time and in the actual cultural setting. Hamer did this with great effort and with the intent to benefit his patients. Many of his patients apparently rejected the help they could have gotten from conventional physicians, like chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and turned to Hamer, but that made him open for criticism by other physicians who saw him as responsible for harming these patients. What is stated by Hamer in his book[1] might very well be understood as a warning to the patients towards his biomedical colleagues and thus he might actually be responsible for inspiring some patients to choose not to accept a documented cure and, thus, if not cured by Hamer, dying in spite of the existence of a cure.

We believe that an adult patient must be respected for his autonomy and integrity, but at the same time, a physician must do whatever he can to convince the patient to accept the most rational treatment. When it comes to metastatic cancer, the problem is that there often is little to do, which has a documented clinical significant effect, the NNT (numbers needed to treat) to obtain an effect going up to between 10-20[6,13]. Patient autonomy must therefore (from a medical ethical perspective) be stressed more and the paternalistic position of the physician stressed less. Still, if we as physicians can understand the Hamer system and give advice to the patients about this system, we will be able to form a good dialog with the autonomous and often desperate cancer patient.

In the present work, we have no intention of testing the Hamer system clinically, but only of analyzing it from a theoretical point of view. We want to compare the Hamer system with contemporary theoretical holistic medicine to see what must be acknowledged in his system as true and valuable insight into the mechanism of holistic health and healing and what must be seen as not true (from our present state of knowledge).

In the future, a deeper theoretical understanding of holistic medicine might show that this analysis is unjust to Hamer's system. To make it simple, we have chosen to build this paper on a small book based on interviews with Hamer called "Cancer - The Riddle That Does Not Exist"[1] instead of on the very comprehensive and complex presentations[2,3,4] of his work. We believe that an analysis of the five principles or "medical laws" presented as the fundamentals of his holistic system of healing is sufficient for establishing the theoretical value of the Hamer system. In this paper, we use our own wordings of Hamer's last four "medical laws", so as not to confuse the subject with the many idiosyncratic concepts of Hamer.

Law Number 1: The Hamer "Iron Law of Cancer"

Hamer claims that all cancer forms arise from an emotional and "biological" shock[1, p. 12], causing the patient to retract from the world with a destructive resignation regarding his fundamental wishes. He stresses that this shock must go so deep that it influences the whole biology of the patient's organism and it must go deeper into existence than just the mind. Interestingly, this law is consistent with both Antonovsky's work on coherence[7,8,9,10,11,12] and on our own life mission theory[14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], which explains development of nongenetic and nontraumatic disease in general and in the same way. Unfortunately, Hamer insists that there are no genetic causes of cancer and that no drug can cause cancer either[1, pp. 49-54]. In his radical insistence on an all-psychological approach, Hamer intimidates a generation of physicians doing research in genetics and the toxicological dangers of smoking. Nevertheless, his "Iron Law of Cancer" (stating the psychosomatic element) seems basically to be in accordance with the works of Antonovsky, Frankl, and our own work in holistic medicine. From a theoretical perspective, we therefore conclude that Hamer's first law of cancer is substantiated.

Interestingly, the process of healing according to Hamer includes a period called the "epileptoform crises" (analogous to an epileptic attack with muscle spasms), where the patient spontaneously regresses to the trauma to integrate this crisis[22]. Only after this incident of healing will the patient improve[1, p. 20]. It is most noteworthy that Hamer observed that the crisis must be sufficiently strong for the patient to heal[1, p. 21]. What Hamer describes here is exactly the same process of healing as described in most work with holistic healing of the patient's whole existence, improving health, quality of life, and ability in general, as explained by the Antonovsky concept of salutogenesis and the holistic process theory of healing[22,23].

The fundamental understanding of the psychosomatic cause of cancer and the ability to win the patients trust and take them into the process of holistic healing of life and existence might very well explain why Hamer's clinical work has been successful for his patients. Claiming that traumas can produce cancer, we can also comprehend (with our present knowledge), but also understand, why he was not well understood and received 20 years ago. As a hypothesis for further research, we would like to see this simple and somewhat provocative statement of Hamer expressed in a little more complex and deeply rooted way to embrace a better understanding of human consciousness[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Only after decades of theoretical work, and only after we recently have been able to induce similar healing processes with cancer patients in our own research clinic, have we been able to accept and understand the controversial first law of Hamer.


Law Number 2: Every Disease has a Pathogenetic and Salutogenetic Phase

Unfortunately, Hamer did not know of Aaron Antonovsky[7,8,9,10,11,12] who did his clinical work and constructed his theory of salutogenesis at the same time. Antonovsky simply explained what Hamer observed, making the process of healing the reverse process of the process of pathogenesis (getting sick). Hamer's understanding of pain also seems to be in accordance with the contemporary understanding of pain (physically, emotionally, and existentially) as a necessary part of the process of healing[1, p. 56]. Most importantly, Hamer stressed the importance of solving existential problems in real life, not only in the psyche[1, p. 20]. Understanding the process of healing and being able to take the patient into the process is really what makes a good holistic physician. From the success of Hamer with his patients, it seems he was able to do this.

Law Number 3: Cancer Development Follows a Simple System of Symbolic Transformation from Psyche to Brain and the Organs of the Body

Many holistic physicians and some of the very popular health prophets of our time, like Louise Hay[32], have claimed the existence of such simple systems that can be used to read the mental and spiritual cause of a physical disease. Unfortunately, we have not yet seen such a system. Quite the contrary, it seems from our research that repressed emotional problems can be moved around in the body and resettle wherever it is most convenient for the organism. The chronic state of whiplash-associated disorder is an example of this[33].

So Law Number 3, for which Hamer gives fylogenetic and ontogenetic arguments, seems to be less accurate from our present state of knowledge. Still, there might be a considerable symbolic element in the disease making the patients able to "listen to the body", but not as schematic as Hamer believed, although we must admit that there could actually be such a symbolic psychosomatic system working in our organism, only with a more complex and not yet discovered set of rules. This is also an important hypothesis for further research.

Law Number 4: Bacteria and Virus are Controlled by the Body and Help the Body in the Process of Healing

This law seems in complete contradiction with our present knowledge of immunology, so it is not likely to be true. The reason for this understanding seems to be the benefit for the patient of going deeply into the salutogenic crisis, which often is taking so many resources from the patient that (s)he will get an opportunistic infection.

Law Number 5: All Diseases are Rational and for the Benefit of the Patients

Hamer agues thus from an evolutionary and possibly teleological perspective. We have not found contemporary knowledge to support this law.

DISCUSSION

Ryke Geerd Hamer wanted his peers to acknowledge his discoveries as hard science. He therefore used the CT scanner to make images of the brain and found that circular patterns (well known as artefacts from the CT scanner) carry vital information on the process of disease and healing. After studying the patterns for years, he claimed that visual pattern, which he then called the "Hamer Herd" or "Hamer Focus" (the German word "herd" means "hearth", the central place of fire in the house) was always present in the CT scan of a cancer patient's brain in the pathogenic phase, revealing the path to healing for this patient. The Hamer focus looks like concentric circles around the part of the brain that represented the sick organ in Hamer's interpretation.

There is a slight possibility that the Hamer focus is actually a great new scientific discovery. It is much more likely to be an artefact that Hamer, for lack of other hard evidence of his theory (which he desperately needed to get his position back in the medical society), gave too much importance. Unfortunately, we do not have the resources necessary to test this part of Hamer's work. The concentric circles in the Hamer focus, shown on the front page of his book[1], looks like an artefact and very little as a biological phenomena, which in humans are almost never seen as concentric circles. If the center of the phenomena actually is placed in the brain according to the system Hamer described, this must be given further analysis.

In the way we recommend holistic medicine to be practiced[34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,
47,48,49,50,51] and understood[14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,52,53,54], the use of CT scans and other high-tech tools are not necessary, as the direct communication and emotional contact with the patient gives all the necessary information for the anamnesis and treatment. One of Hamer's mistakes, in our opinion, might have been to connect what seems to be an important rediscovery of the Hippocratic tradition of holistic treatment used on cancer patients with the CT scan picture, which made it very easy for his peers to ridicule his "spiritistic readings" of the CT images.

The most problematic consequence of this attachment to his third law and the CT scans was his belief that cancers were not able to metastasize[1, p. 47]. He believed that metastases were new cancers developed by the new shocks patients received when they encountered biomedicine. This conviction made him highly unpopular with many biomedically oriented oncologists (cancer physicians) because it made many of his believers avoid conventional physicians. Our own position is the opposite and we believe that modern holistic medicine should acknowledge the well-documented and sad fact that cancers do metastasize, often with the death of the patient as a consequence.

It seems to us that Hamer was too little rooted in the science of biology to make sufficient theories of the highly dynamic picture of cancer he experienced in his clinical practice. On the other hand, biology definitely needs an upgrade to embrace this dynamic[27,28], as already stressed by big thinkers like Nobel laureate (in 1933) Erwin Schrödinger (1887-1961)[55]. Our review of the work of Hamer came to the same conclusion as the Swiss Study Group for Complementary and Alternative Methods in Cancer (SCAC)[56], who found no evidence that most of his assertions were correct, no case of a cure has been published, and an investigation by Der Spiegel through the German authorities identified 50 cancer patients that had been in the care of Hamer and only 7 survived[56]. Still we find that when treated only with psychosocial intervention, a success rate of 15% with this group of mortally ill metastatic cancer patients is remarkable and encouraging for further research.

CONCLUSION

For decades, Ryke Geerd Hamer has been a controversial figure in holistic medicine with the claim that cancer was a simple thing to heal with holistic medicine. He gave his peers gray hair because of his reference to his five "medical laws", most of which were not substantiated and some of which were in direct conflict with existing medical theory. It is pretty clear from our analysis that the two most fundamental principles of Hamer's work (his first and second laws) are well-established principles of holistic medicine today, worded nicely by the Jewish thinker Aaron Antonovsky, but in reality going all the way back to the father of medicine, Hippocrates[57]. Hamer's understanding of symbols in medicine, virus and bacteria, and the evolutionary process itself differs a great deal from traditional science and we cannot find support for his last three principles or "medical laws" in contemporary holistic medical theory. As Hamer's understanding of cancer metastasis was built on these failing principles, we suggest that this aspect of Hamer's thinking (which has been a major reason for controversy) is also not substantiated: Cancer metastasis is not likely to be new cancers induced by the shock the modern biomedical physician gives his patient.

Altogether, it seems that Hamer is in accordance with contemporary holistic medical theory, as the most fundamental principles of his work are built on an understanding very similar to holistic medical thinkers of today and of the past; regarding the most fundamental postulate that cancer patients can be healed by his system of holistic medicine could actually be the case for some of the motivated patients. This must be tested scientifically, however, before being accepted. If proven, we must recommend a rehabilitation of the name and work of Ryke Geerd Hamer. Clinical testing of a cure for cancer based on Hamer's system must be considered worth the effort; it must be done with physicians trained by Hamer if at all possible.

At the Research Clinic for Holistic Medicine in Copenhagen, we do clinical research to understand how to use Hamer's first two "laws of cancer": that we are often damaged by emotionally painful life events making us vulnerable also to the development of cancer and that we can heal by reversing the pathogenetic process into a salutogenic process and regaining biological order[5,6,22,23,33,51,58]. It is of utmost importance that we test and document the effect of such experimental treatments, and we have therefore developed a simple, easy-to-use, and low-cost strategy for documenting holistic healing[59]. We invite the scientific medical community to cooperate in this important new field of evidence-based holistic medicine growing from an emerging scientific understanding of the connections between health, quality of life, and consciousness[31]. We encourage governments and research foundations to give funding in the promising area of holistic cancer treatment a high priority; many patients now want this kind of treatment as it is becoming increasingly popular. The chance of succeeding with the development of a scientific holistic cure for cancer seems fair from a theoretical perspective, and Hamer's work has pointed out a direction to follow, even if we do not want to use his particular system.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study was supported by grants from IMK Almene Fond. The quality of life research was approved by the Copenhagen Scientific Ethical Committee under number (KF)V.100.2123/91.

--------------------
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" G.Orwell


Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Отто
Човек
***

Регистриран: 15.09.2004
Мнения: 1989
Re: The five biological laws
    #1929815 - 24.10.2007 18:21 [Re: Отто]

Intra-ductal breast cancer

SBS – SIGNIFICANT BIOLOGICAL SPECIAL PROGRAM OF NATURE


BREAST CANCER
written by Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer

On an emotional level, a woman predominantly experiences the bond with her child (as well as that with her partner) in her breasts. This is why breast cancers are the most frequent diseases in women.



German New Medicine (GNM) recognizes two types of breast cancer:



1. Glandular breast cancer, clinically also called adenoid mammary carcinoma, noticeable as a solid compact lump.



2. Milk duct cancer, clinically known as intra-ductal carcinoma, which is not noticeable during the conflict active phase. The woman might feel only a slight pulling sensation in the affected breast area.



Additionally, the exterior skin of the breast can develop squamous epithelial skin carcinomas or neurodermatitis - which can occur elsewhere on the body as well.



In general, the conflicts linked to a breast gland carcinoma always relate to an argument conflict or worry conflict, while for milk duct ulcerations it is always a separation conflict.



The significance of right-handedness and left-handedness: anyone can establish the laterality for oneself. Clap your hands as you would when applauding in a theatre.



The hand that is on top is the prominent or leading hand, indicating the person's biological handedness. If the right hand strikes the left, then one is right-handed, and conversely, if the left hand strikes the right, one is left-handed. This test is very important for finding out from which brain hemisphere a person functions, because there are untold rehabilitated left-handed people who deem themselves right-handed. Simply put, the right hemisphere of both the cerebellum and the cerebrum predominantly control the left side of the body, and conversely, the left hemisphere of both the cerebellum and the cerebrum control the right side of the body.



In short: a right-handed woman associates her left breast with her child, her mother, and her nest (dwelling, house). Her right breast not only relates to her partner (spouse or friend), but also to partners such as her father, brother, sister, mother-in-law, boss, neighbor, etc. She can also consider small children or animals as her ‘children’.



If a right-handed woman develops breast gland cancer in the left breast, then she has either a worry conflict related to her child, her mother, or her nest, or she has an argument conflict with her child, her mother, or in association with her nest. With milk duct ulceration, on the other hand, she is conflict active with a separation from her child, her mother, or her nest.



With a left-handed woman it is the reverse: the right breast relates to her child, her mother, or the nest, and the left breast relates to her partner or other partners, as described above. Therefore, if she has a breast gland cancer in the right breast, she has a worry conflict concerning her child, her mother, or her nest. With milk duct ulceration in the right breast she is active with a separation conflict related to her child, her mother, or her nest.



Since the conflict content of both types of breast cancer is different, the control centers in the brain are also in different locations. The brain relay for breast gland cancer (mesoderm) is in the lateral area of the cerebellum, the control center for the milk duct ulcerations (ectoderm) is in the sensory cortex of the cerebrum. Both brain relays control the organ (breast) on the opposite side.



Breast gland cancer belongs to cancers that are controlled from the old brain, which, according to the ”Ontogenetic System of SBS“ (Third Biological Law) generate cell proliferation during the conflict active phase. In contrast, milk duct ulcers are directed from the cerebrum with ulceration (tissue degeneration) during the conflict active phase.



In the healing phase, everything proceeds the other way around: compact tumors that grew during the conflict active phase through cell proliferation are now broken down and decomposed (caseated) by microbes, e.g., fungi or mycobacteria, such as tubercular bacteria (if present). Cerebrum-directed tissue loss is restored through cell augmentation during the healing phase.



In standard medical practice, these correlations are not known, nor does anyone differentiate between a conflict active phase and a healing phase. One simply designates everything that causes cell proliferation or tissue changes as "malignant".



[color=darkred]Glandular breast cancer


Example: A mother suffered a DHS, when she dropped her baby. The baby hit its head on the floor and was unconscious for a while. Since the woman experienced the shock as a mother-child worry conflict and was right-handed, an adenoid breast gland cancer developed in her left breast. This response is by no means meaningless. The purpose of the increase of additional breast gland tissue is to assist her baby by providing more breast milk than before. This way the mother’s organism tries to compensate for the inflicted harm.



The breast gland tumor continues to grow (with increased milk production) as long as the conflict persists. Thus, during sympathicotonia, i.e., in the conflict active phase, the nursing mother has in her ”sick“ breast more milk than before. The resolution only occurs when the child is well again. This is the moment when the breast gland cells stop multiplying.



We can see now that the changes that we previously called diseases are in fact exactly the opposite, namely very meaningful interactions with Nature's biological processes, e.g., between a mother and her child, or between a woman and her mate.



Another woman had a worry conflict in relation to her husband, which caused a cancer in her breast glands. Since she remained conflict active until after she gave birth to their child, she continued to produce abundant milk on the right partner breast long after the milk production of her left breast had ceased. At the end of nursing, the breast gland cancer underwent tubercular caseation with the usual night sweats, and finally decomposed.



This healing process might be painful; the so-called ‘cerebellum pain’ is typical for healing of the corium skin: The corium skin or under skin is the skin layer underneath the epidermis. It is our first skin which developed during the course of evolution}, particularly with shingles. Women describe it as a sharp pain at the site of the tumor. The pain is caused by the formation of scars (cicatrisation). At the end of the healing phase, a breast CT scan (computer tomogram) will show a cavern at the previous site of the tumor.



These processes also occur outside the actual nursing period and in non-nursing women, in general. If, for example, a woman experiences a mother/child worry conflict after the nursing has stopped, a breast gland tumor will nevertheless still grow, simulating the intent to offer more milk to her nursling, even if the baby is no longer an infant. This has prompted our modern medical doctors to regard such tumors as something totally senseless and diseased - as an error of nature - because they completely lost the understanding of its original purpose.



In the healing phase – provided, the conflict can be resolved - the tumor is decomposed by tubercular bacteria (if they are present). If no TB bacteria are available, the tumor encapsulates and stays, of course without caseation.



But how can anyone then die of breast cancer, you might ask.



Apart from long lasting conflicts, which in rare cases lead to death, one must say that iatrogenic, i.e., doctor-caused panic conflicts such as a fear of cancer panic (see ”frontal fear conflicts“, a death panic, or a self devaluation conflict that follow a breast cancer diagnosis often trigger new cancers (orthodox medicine calls this 'metastases'. Unfortunately, this is the rule these days - and one can very easily die from those fears. However, all this is totally unrelated to the original disease.




Intra-ductal breast cancer


[color=darkred]While there is cell proliferation in the conflict active phase of a breast gland cancer, we see ulceration or tissue loss in the milk duct lining during the ca-phase of a milk duct SBS. From a psychological point of view, we are always dealing with a separation conflict either from a child, the mother, or a partner. We have to look at this type of conflict in an entirely realistic and literal manner as if two individuals are glued together, and along with the separation a piece of the skin is pulled off. This is what we typically see in the clinical picture of neurodermatitis. However, these ulcerations are only one symptom, the other is a sensory paralysis of the milk ducts.



If the sensory paralysis reaches to the outer skin of the breast, the woman has no sensitivity at the nipple. This is usually not noticed, as opposed to breast gland carcinoma where, depending on the breast size and the location, a lump can already be felt after a few weeks.



An exception with milk duct cancer is the so-called cirrhotic lump which occurs if the conflict continues practically non-stop. In a mammogram, such a cirrhotic lump can sometimes take the shape of a compact nodule. Typical also are small calcium deposits (micro-calcification).



Once the separation conflict is resolved, a complication emerges that is biologically not planned because in the course of a natural healing process the baby would normally suck the breast dry. As no milk is being produced (in a non-nursing woman), the wound secretion has often no outlet and therefore becomes congested in the breast. As a result, the breast becomes hot, bright red, and swells up quickly. In this case, the breast becomes larger only at the beginning of the healing phase, while with breast gland cancer the process is the reverse.



A leaking breast is an encouraging sign and a good indication that the affected milk ducts are not completely congested as the secretion can empty outwardly through the nipple (sometimes the discharge literally drips off). Unpleasant as it may be, the sensitivity now returns, almost excessively (hypersensitivity or hyperesthesia). If the conflict has lasted for a long time, the woman may sometimes notice a sensation of internal shrinking of the breast.



One should operate a breast cancer only if it appears advisable. For instance, when a woman feels disfigured because of the lump, or when a DHS-related melanoma develops and/or if, for some reason, the epithelial layer bursts. This would result in an open, suppurating, fetid breast, which can be very problematic. The same also happens when the breast is opened through a cut, or through a puncture.




© Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer


Testimonial Cherry Trumpower
Testimonial Silvia Herzig
Testimonial Gisella Kerstin




[color=red]Lung Cancer Testimonial - Dave T.

Intra-bronchial cancer (squamous epithelial carcinoma)


Pulmonary lung cancer (adeno carcimoma)

[color=red]Pleural carcinoma


[color=red]Small-cell bronchial carcinoma


[size=14pt]"Does smoking cause lung cancer?" [/size]


SBS – SIGNIFICANT BIOLOGICAL SPECIAL PROGRAM OF NATURE

[color=red]LUNG CANCER and ”LUNG CANCER“ is not the same

written by Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer




The Third Biological Law of German New Medicine, the ”Ontogenetic System of SBSs", organizes all so-called diseases according to germ layer affiliations, i.e., in relation to the inner germ layer, the middle germ layer, and the outer germ layer, which all develop right from the beginning of the embryonic development.



Each cell, that is to say every organ of the body, can be assigned to a specific germ layer and, in accordance with the evolutionary developments, each of these germ layers correlates to certain brain areas as well as to certain histological formations. In addition, as far as cell proliferation and cell loss are concerned, cerebral cortex directed organs and old brain controlled organs respond during the conflict active phase and during the healing phase exactly in a reverse manner.



Cells and organs that develop from the inner germ layer have their control relays in the brainstem. In the case of cancer, they always generate cell augmentation with compact adeno-cell type tumors. Cells and organs which develop from the outer germ layer, on the other hand, are controlled from the cerebral cortex and always cause cell decrease in form of ulcers or functional changes, as seen in diabetes and paralysis.



With regard to the middle germ layer, we distinguish an older and a younger group. Cells and organs that belong to the older group have their control relay in the cerebellum, that is to say, they still belong to the old brain and produce, in the case of cancer, adeno-cell type tumors during the conflict active phase. The cells and organs which belong to the younger group have their control center in the cerebral medulla and cause tissue loss in the form of necroses.



This clearly shows that cancer is not a senseless event of madly proliferating cells but a comprehensible and even foreseeable process that abides very precisely by ontogenetic laws.





[color=red]Bronchial carcinoma

The intra-bronchial squamous epithelial ca or bronchial carcinoma belongs to the outer germ layer and is controlled from the cerebrum. Thus, during the conflict active phase there is no cell proliferation (tumor growth) in the bronchial mucosa but rather the opposite, namely an ulceration, i.e., a bronchial carcinoma is in fact an ulcerous lesion.



During the healing phase the bronchus can occlude due to the swelling of the mucosa. This occlusion, called atelectasis, is often merely a temporary lack of aeration which together with pruritus (itching) provokes intense coughing. It is tragic that in most cases it is only in the repair phase that the bronchial carcinoma is discovered. If these patients were to find their way to German New Medicine before they are given a negative diagnosis and prognosis, 95% of these patients would survive, because they are already in the healing phase.



Starting with the cerebellum, right- and left-handedness becomes relevant in order to establish which side of the patient's brain is predominant. For all control centers of the cerebellum and cerebrum there is a cross-over correlation from the brain to the organ.



The conflict that is linked to the bronchia is always one of fear in the territory. The territorial fear can be experienced in two ways: as a motor conflict or as a sensory conflict. The sensory territorial fear manifests itself during the healing phase as pneumonia and in the epileptoid crisis as a pneumonic lysis. "Asthma" involves the bronchial musculature which responds to a motor, i.e. not being able to move or maneuver, territorial fear conflict.



A territorial fear can only be experienced by men or by post-menopausal women. However, a left-handed young woman can also develop a bronchial carcinoma, but only as a result of a female scare-fright conflict. The bronchial carcinoma would in this case be accompanied with a depression. Here too, the exceptions would be the constellations and hormonal changes (e.g., birth control pill).



According to the Fourth Biological Natural Law of German New Medicine, ”The Ontogenetic System of Microbes“, during the healing phase old brain directed organs decompose their tumors with the help of specialized microbes, while any holes or ulcerations of cerebrum directed organs are refilled with the help of certain bacteria and viruses (if they exist!!!)



[color=red]Pulmonary lung cancer (adeno carcinoma)


An alveolar adeno carcinoma, also called pulmonary lung cancer, pertains to the inner germ layer, is directed by the brainste and always relates to a death fright conflict. The tumor grows during the conflict active phase, is decomposed in the healing phase by mycobacteria such as tubercular bacteria (provided they are present), becomes caseated and is coughed out. All that is left are caverns (holes).



Previously we thought that microbes cause so-called infectious diseases. This seemed to be a reasonable assumption as these microbes are always present in infectious diseases. However, this wasn’t quite right, because every infectious disease is preceded by a conflict active phase and only when the related conflict is resolved are those micro-organisms allowed to become active. In fact, they are activated and directed from the brain. Microbes assist the healing process by breaking down tumors, which have become superfluous, or they reconstruct and refill gaps, necroses, and tissue ulceration, which are controlled from the cerebrum. Microbes are our loyal helpers. The notion of an immune system as an army that fights the evil microbes is patently wrong.



If the tubercular bacteria are absent during healing, the lung nodules remain. There are many patients who have a number of pulmonary lung nodules of varying sizes as a carry-over condition originating from a death fright e.g., that concerned a relative who has met with an accident (or a pet). Such pulmonary nodules are often accidentally discovered during a routine examination - often years later, while the patients are no longer ill. If they had tubercular bacteria present at the time, they would now have lung caverns and nobody would speak of a lung tumor.



Healing pulmonary nodules also used to be diagnosed as lung tuberculosis. Now they are more and more diagnosed as lung cancer. This way, tuberculosis diminished (as a disease) and cancer increased. Strange, that nobody noticed this.



When a patient receives a ”cancer" diagnosis, this is often experienced as a devastating shock that instantly triggers further panic conflicts and new conflict shocks causing new cancers, which standard medicine then calls ”metastases“. Thus, ”metastasis“ is first and foremost caused by iatrogenic (doctor-caused) diagnosis- and prognosis shocks.



The ”metastasis fairytale“ is a conglomeration of all kinds of suppositions and unproven hypotheses. No researcher has ever been able to find a cancer cell in the arterial blood of a cancer patient. If true, that's where you would normally find them - swimming in the peripheral blood stream of the body. It is absolute insanity and medieval dogmatism to think that migrating cancer cells, on their never-observed meanderings through the blood, could mutate into another cell type. As an example, a colon cancer cell (endoderm and brainstem controlled) that had formed a cauliflower-like tumor in the colon is imagined to suddenly travel into the bones (mesodermal and cerebral medulla controlled) causing bone loss.



”The Ontogenetic System of SBSs“ (Third Biological Law) has by now definitely refuted that, for instance, a cell that was controlled by the old brain and had created compact tumors, could all of a sudden leave its allocated brain control relay, associate itself to the cerebrum and fabricate cell decrease.


[color=red]Pleural carcinoma


All too often, patients experience a "breast cancer" or "lung cancer" diagnosis as an attack (conflict) against the thorax area and as a result develop an additional pleural cancer or pleural carcinoma. This type of carcinoma belongs biologically to the old brain mesoderm of the cerebellum and therefore generates a tumor of the adenoid cell type during the conflict active phase. With the cell proliferation the organism tries - and this is the biological purpose - to protect itself against such attacks by forming a flat mesothelioma (pleural carcinoma), which essentially reinforces the pleura.



Such a pleural mesothelioma is usually only noticed after the conflict has been resolved. That is the case because all cerebellum directed tumors produce fluids during the healing phase. In the case of the pleura, this is called a pleural effusion - in the peritoneum we call it ascites, and in the pericardium a pericardial effusion. However, this holds true only with the ”Syndrome“ - otherwise, we call it pleuritis, peritonitis, or pericarditis.



[color=red]Small-cell bronchial carcinoma

With orthodox medicine, the patient is now jumping from the fire into the proverbial frying pan. The diagnosis of "pleural carcinoma" (interpreted as "metastasis") most likely triggers a new shock, for example, a cancer fright conflict or frontal fear conflict, which causes ulceration in the pharyngeal ducts. This too is usually noticed only in the healing phase when the squamous epithelial mucosa in the ulcerated area swells up, and serous fluid-containing cysts are formed. Conventional medicine erroneously calls this a centro-cystic-centro-blastic Non-Hodgkin’s "lymphoma". After several relapses, the cysts indurate. In the mediastinum they can reach to the diaphragm. Even here, the diagnosis is given exclusively in the healing phase when the patient feels discomfort. Tragically, the diagnosis now becomes a "small-cell bronchial carcinoma".



Surely, it is not difficult to realize why, after only a few weeks or months, most patients die as a result of the panic and ensuing conflicts. One can easily assume that about 80% of secondary and tertiary cancers are the result of iatrogenically induced diagnosis shocks together with an obsolete pseudo-therapy.


[color=red]"Does smoking cause lung cancer?"

In a large-scale study that lasted over several years, thousands of hamsters were constantly exposed to cigarette smoke while control animals were not. The researchers discovered that not a single animal manifested a bronchial carcinoma or a lung cancer. They had simply missed the fact that hamsters live underground and have absolutely no fear of smoke. That's why they have no code in their brains, no warning light against smoke.



With house mice it is exactly the reverse. They suffer an acute death fright with the least amount of smoke and run away. In fact, in medieval times, when one saw a swarm of mice run out of a house, one knew that there was a fire somewhere. Some of these mice can indeed develop a lung cancer, triggered by the death fright.



These examples should suffice to illustrate that today's animal testing is nothing but cruelty, ignoring that animals have a soul. Therefore, I allow myself the following prediction: one day, all animal experimentation will be exposed as a disgrace for our whole society and will be seen as a testimony to our unspeakable lack of knowledge and sensitivity. There is also absolutely no proof that carcinogenic substances act directly upon an organ, bypassing the brain.



Standard medicine has assembled many correct facts. German New Medicine® doesn’t deny most of these facts. However, we do contest their interpretation.




© Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer



Lung Cancer Testimonial Dave T. - USA

--------------------
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" G.Orwell

Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Отто
Човек
***

Регистриран: 15.09.2004
Мнения: 1989
Re: The five biological laws
    #1959044 - 24.11.2007 20:19 [Re: Отто]

НеЩо ново и на бьлгарски еzик.Наи после.Труда ми не е напраzен.

http://www.lechitel.bg/newspaper.php?s=0&b=92

--------------------
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" G.Orwell


Екстри: Изпечатай мнението   Напомни ми!   Уведоми модератора  
Страници: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | >> (покажи всички)



Допълнителна информация
0 регистрирани и 2 анонимни потребители в момента разглеждат този форум.

Модератор:  D-r Kostova 

Изпечатай темата

Възможности в този форум:
Не можете да добавяте нови теми
Не можете да отговаряте на мненията
HTML - забранен
Псевдо-HTML - разрешен

Рейтинг: *****
Брой показвания: 41318

Мнението ти за темата:

Прехвърли се в



ALL.BG не носи отговорност за съдържанието на мненията, публикувани във форумите.

НАЧАЛОРЕКЛАМАВРЪЗКА С НАСКОНТАКТИЗА НАС

©1999-2015 ALL.BG Всички права запазени!

Generated in 0.009 seconds in which 0.001 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression enabled.